1994 Renault Ludo vs. 2011 Mazda 2

To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Renault Ludo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Renault Ludo would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Renault Ludo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 2 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1994 Renault Ludo. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1994 Renault Ludo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 2 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1994 Renault Ludo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 2 (205 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Renault Ludo. (107 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Renault Ludo. 1994 Renault Ludo has automatic transmission and 2011 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2011 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Renault Ludo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: