1994 Renault Ludo vs. 2013 Lotus Evora

To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Renault Ludo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Renault Ludo would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 1994 Renault Ludo. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1994 Renault Ludo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 425 kg more than 1994 Renault Ludo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Renault Ludo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (400 Nm) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Renault Ludo. (107 Nm). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Renault Ludo. 1994 Renault Ludo has automatic transmission and 2013 Lotus Evora has manual transmission. 2013 Lotus Evora will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Renault Ludo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: