1994 Rover 100 vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 1994 Rover 100 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Volvo 220 (74 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1994 Rover 100. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Volvo 220 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Volvo 220 weights approximately 131 kg more than 1994 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 100. (90 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1962 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Rover 100 | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Rover | Volvo |
| Model | 100 | 220 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1113 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 884 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1510 mm |
