1994 Rover 100 vs. 2003 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2003 Smart Roadster is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 100 would be higher. At 1,113 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Rover 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Smart Roadster (100 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1994 Rover 100. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Smart Roadster should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 100.
Because 2003 Smart Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Smart Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Smart Roadster (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 100. (90 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2003 Smart Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Rover 100 | 2003 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Rover | Smart |
Model | 100 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1113 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1200 mm |