1994 Rover 200 vs. 1951 Singer SM 1500
To start off, 1994 Rover 200 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Singer SM 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Singer SM 1500 would be higher. At 1,495 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Singer SM 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (47 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1951 Singer SM 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover 200 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1951 Singer SM 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Singer SM 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Singer SM 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover 200 (128 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (98 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1994 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Singer SM 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Rover 200 | 1951 Singer SM 1500 | |
Make | Rover | Singer |
Model | 200 | SM 1500 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 89.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2320 mm |