1994 Rover 200 vs. 1962 Willys-Overland Dauphine
To start off, 1994 Rover 200 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Willys-Overland Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Willys-Overland Dauphine would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Willys-Overland Dauphine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Willys-Overland Dauphine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Rover 200 | 1962 Willys-Overland Dauphine | |
Make | Rover | Willys-Overland |
Model | 200 | Dauphine |
Year Released | 1994 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2280 mm |