1994 Rover 200 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1994 Rover 200 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover 200 (66 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover 200 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover 200 (123 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Rover 200 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Rover | Zastava |
| Model | 200 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
