1994 Rover 200 vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover 200 (198 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2002 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda CR-V weights approximately 293 kg more than 1994 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover 200 (237 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 1994 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Rover 200 | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Rover | Honda |
| Model | 200 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1690 mm |
