1994 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2010 Cadillac SRX is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac SRX (265 HP @ 6950 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (66 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 706 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac SRX (302 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (123 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Rover 200 | 2010 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Rover | Cadillac |
| Model | 200 | SRX |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6950 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1916 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4834 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1669 mm |
