1994 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (66 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 487 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (370 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (123 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Rover 200 | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Rover | Chevrolet |
| Model | 200 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 304 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 370 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1697 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1377 mm |
