1994 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (66 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 56 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (123 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Rover 200 | 2010 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | Rover | Chevrolet |
| Model | 200 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 2901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1266 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1650 mm |
