1994 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford C-Max (95 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (66 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 340 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford C-Max (230 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (123 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2010 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Rover 200 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Rover | Ford |
| Model | 200 | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1684 mm |
