1994 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 376 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (128 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Rover 200 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Rover | Volvo |
Model | 200 | C30 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2639 mm |