1994 Rover 200 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover 200 (198 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. (180 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 595 kg more than 1994 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover 200 (237 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1994 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Rover 200 | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Rover | Chevrolet |
Model | 200 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 98 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1760 mm |