1994 Rover 400 vs. 2006 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2006 Toyota Tundra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 400 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Tundra (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1994 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 400.
Because 2006 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Tundra (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Rover 400 | 2006 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 400 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3270 mm |