1994 Rover 400 vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 400 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL (228 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1994 Rover 400. (88 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 400.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL (300 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 400. (180 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Rover 400 | 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Rover | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 400 | SL |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1298 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2560 mm |