1994 Rover 600 vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 600 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Rover 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (149 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1994 Rover 600. (130 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 600.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (220 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 600. (178 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 600.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Rover 600 | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Rover | Volkswagen |
Model | 600 | Polo |
Year Released | 1994 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2470 mm |