1994 Rover 600 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 600 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1994 Rover 600. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 600.
Because 2012 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 600. (178 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 600.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Rover 600 | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Rover | Holden |
Model | 600 | Colorado |
Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |