1994 Rover 800 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 800 would be higher. At 2,675 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Rover 800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1994 Rover 800. (167 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 42 kg more than 1994 Rover 800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 800. (225 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 800.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Rover 800 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Rover | Cadillac |
| Model | 800 | BLS |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2675 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 225 Nm | 265 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1566 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |
