1994 Rover Range Rover vs. 1996 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 1996 Suzuki Baleno is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,552 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover Range Rover (225 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (98 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1185 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover Range Rover (375 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (133 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1994 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. 1994 Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1996 Suzuki Baleno has manual transmission. 1996 Suzuki Baleno will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Rover Range Rover | 1996 Suzuki Baleno | |
| Make | Rover | Suzuki |
| Model | Range Rover | Baleno |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4552 cc | 1589 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 98 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 375 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2220 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 51 L |
