1994 Rover Range Rover vs. 2002 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2002 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,552 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1050 kg more than 2002 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Rover Range Rover | 2002 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Rover | Nissan |
| Model | Range Rover | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4552 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2220 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |
