1994 Rover Range Rover vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2002 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover Range Rover (190 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1345 kg more than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Rover Range Rover | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Rover | ZAZ |
Model | Range Rover | Wagon |
Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3947 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.1 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2330 mm |