1994 Rover Range Rover vs. 2003 Tata E

To start off, 2003 Tata E is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,552 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover Range Rover (225 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2003 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2003 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 846 kg more than 2003 Tata E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Tata E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover Range Rover (375 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Tata E. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1994 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Tata E. 1994 Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2003 Tata E has manual transmission. 2003 Tata E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: