1994 Rover Range Rover vs. 2004 Spyker C8
To start off, 2004 Spyker C8 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 940 kg more than 2004 Spyker C8.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Spyker C8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Rover Range Rover | 2004 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Rover | Spyker |
| Model | Range Rover | C8 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3947 cc | 4172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.5 seconds | 4.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 100 L |
