1994 Rover Range Rover vs. 2010 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2010 Nissan GT-R is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan GT-R (485 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (190 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 360 kg more than 2010 Nissan GT-R.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan GT-R (588 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (306 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Rover Range Rover | 2010 Nissan GT-R | |
| Make | Rover | Nissan |
| Model | Range Rover | GT-R |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3947 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 485 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 306 Nm | 588 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1372 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2779 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 74 L |
