1994 Rover Range Rover vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover Range Rover (190 HP) has 111 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Nissan Micra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover Range Rover (306 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1994 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Rover Range Rover | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Rover | Nissan |
Model | Range Rover | Micra |
Year Released | 1994 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3947 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 306 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 46 L |