1994 Rover Range Rover vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover Range Rover (134 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover Range Rover (271 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1994 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Rover Range Rover | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | Range Rover | Matrix |
Year Released | 1994 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2601 mm |