1994 Rover Range Rover vs. 2013 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2013 Ford Fusion is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Fusion (234 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (134 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 555 kg more than 2013 Ford Fusion.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Fusion (339 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (271 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Rover Range Rover | 2013 Ford Fusion | |
| Make | Rover | Ford |
| Model | Range Rover | Fusion |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 234 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 83 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4869 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1476 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2850 mm |
