1994 Rover Range Rover vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (190 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 477 kg more than 2013 Volvo S60.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S60 (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (306 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Rover Range Rover | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Rover | Volvo |
Model | Range Rover | S60 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3947 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 306 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.1 mm | 93 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.5 seconds | 7.5 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1613 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2097 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1484 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2776 mm |