1994 Toyota Crown vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 260 kg more than 1994 Toyota Crown.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1994 Toyota Crown has manual transmission. 1994 Toyota Crown will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Toyota Crown | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Crown | Mustang |
Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 4603 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 260 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |