1994 TVR Type S vs. 2010 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2010 Nissan NP300 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 TVR Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 TVR Type S would be higher. At 2,931 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 TVR Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan NP300 weights approximately 389 kg more than 1994 TVR Type S.
Because 1994 TVR Type S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 TVR Type S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan NP300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 TVR Type S | 2010 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | TVR | Nissan |
Model | Type S | NP300 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2931 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2960 mm |