1994 TVR Type S vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 TVR Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 TVR Type S would be higher. At 2,931 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 TVR Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Equator weights approximately 35 kg more than 1994 TVR Type S.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 1994 TVR Type S has manual transmission. 1994 TVR Type S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 TVR Type S | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | TVR | Suzuki |
| Model | Type S | Equator |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2931 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3200 mm |
