1994 Volvo 850 vs. 2010 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2010 Nissan Murano is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Murano (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1994 Volvo 850. (240 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1994 Volvo 850.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Volvo 850 (407 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Murano. (336 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1994 Volvo 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Murano.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Volvo 850 | 2010 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Volvo | Nissan |
Model | 850 | Murano |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2319 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2824 mm |