1995 AC Ace vs. 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600
To start off, 1995 AC Ace is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 AC Ace (350 HP) has 207 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 AC Ace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 AC Ace (407 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (216 Nm). This means 1995 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 AC Ace | 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 | |
| Make | AC | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Ace | 2600 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2584 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 143 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2590 mm |
