1995 AC Ace vs. 1983 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1995 AC Ace is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 AC Ace (350 HP) has 234 more horse power than 1983 Lancia Beta. (116 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1983 Lancia Beta.
Because 1983 Lancia Beta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Lancia Beta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 AC Ace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 AC Ace (407 Nm) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Lancia Beta. (165 Nm). This means 1995 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 AC Ace | 1983 Lancia Beta | |
| Make | AC | Lancia |
| Model | Ace | Beta |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 116 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2310 mm |
