1995 AC Ace vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 AC Ace would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 AC Ace (350 HP) has 202 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 AC Ace (407 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 1995 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1995 AC Ace | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | AC | Holden |
Model | Ace | Epica |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2700 mm |