1995 AC Ace vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 AC Ace would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 AC Ace (350 HP) has 192 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 AC Ace (407 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm). This means 1995 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix. 2012 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1995 AC Ace has manual transmission. 1995 AC Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 AC Ace | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Ace | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 219 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2601 mm |
