1995 AC Ace vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 AC Ace would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (380 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1995 AC Ace. (350 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1995 AC Ace.
Because 2013 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 AC Ace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (515 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 AC Ace. (407 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 AC Ace | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | AC | Jaguar |
| Model | Ace | XK |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 380 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2752 mm |
