1995 AC Ace vs. 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover
To start off, 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 AC Ace would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover (370 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1995 AC Ace. (350 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1995 AC Ace.
Because 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 AC Ace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover (508 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 AC Ace. (407 Nm). This means 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 AC Ace | 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover | |
| Make | AC | Land Rover |
| Model | Ace | ALL-NEW Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2013 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 370 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 508 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2745 mm |
