1995 AC Ace vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 AC Ace would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1995 AC Ace. (350 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1995 AC Ace.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 AC Ace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 AC Ace. (407 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 AC Ace. 2013 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1995 AC Ace has manual transmission. 1995 AC Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 AC Ace | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Ace | Tundra |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 376 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 544 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3700 mm |