1995 Acura CL-X vs. 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo
To start off, 1995 Acura CL-X is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Acura CL-X is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Acura CL-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Acura CL-X has automatic transmission and 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo has manual transmission. 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Acura CL-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Acura CL-X | 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo | |
| Make | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | CL-X | Navajo |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3210 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
