1995 Acura CL-X vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Acura CL-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Acura CL-X would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Acura CL-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Acura CL-X has automatic transmission and 1999 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1999 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Acura CL-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Acura CL-X | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | CL-X | Mustang |
Year Released | 1995 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 256 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |