1995 Acura CL-X vs. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Acura CL-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Acura CL-X would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Acura CL-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Acura CL-X has automatic transmission and 2002 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Acura CL-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Acura CL-X | 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
| Model | CL-X | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3210 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
