1995 Acura CL-X vs. 2002 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Acura CL-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Acura CL-X would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Acura CL-X is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Acura CL-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Acura CL-X | 2002 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Acura | Subaru |
Model | CL-X | Outback |
Year Released | 1995 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |