1995 Acura CL-X vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Acura CL-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Acura CL-X would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Acura CL-X is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Acura CL-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Acura CL-X | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | CL-X | Ranger |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |