1995 Acura CL-X vs. 2006 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Acura CL-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Acura CL-X would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Acura CL-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Acura CL-X | 2006 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Acura | Jeep |
Model | CL-X | Commander |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 5653 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 322 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |