1995 Acura NSX vs. 2000 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Acura NSX would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 458 kg more than 1995 Acura NSX.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Acura NSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (442 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Acura NSX. (414 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Acura NSX.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Acura NSX | 2000 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Acura | GMC |
Model | NSX | Yukon |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Size | 3178 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 414 Nm | 442 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2990 mm |