1995 Acura NSX vs. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod
To start off, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Acura NSX would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1995 Acura NSX. (271 HP @ 7300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 1995 Acura NSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Acura NSX weights approximately 68 kg more than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Because 1995 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Acura NSX (284 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. (178 Nm). This means 1995 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Acura NSX | 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | NSX | XR 8 Xplod |
Year Released | 1995 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 469 HP |
Engine RPM | 7300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 284 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2620 mm |