1995 Acura NSX vs. 2009 Volvo XC90

To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Acura NSX (420 HP @ 8250 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 2009 Volvo XC90. (235 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 101 kg more than 1995 Acura NSX.

Because 2009 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Acura NSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Acura NSX (414 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1995 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo XC90.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Acura NSX 2009 Volvo XC90
Make Acura Volvo
Model NSX XC90
Year Released 1995 2009
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 3178 cc 3192 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 420 HP 235 HP
Engine RPM 8250 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 414 Nm 320 Nm
Torque RPM 5500 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1497 kg 1598 kg
Vehicle Length 4420 mm 4810 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 2870 mm