1995 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Alfa Romeo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Alfa Romeo 145 would be higher. Both 1995 Alfa Romeo 145 and 2001 Mazda CU-X are equipped with a 1,970 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Alfa Romeo 145 (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Alfa Romeo 145 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 105 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo 145.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Alfa Romeo 145. (186 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Alfa Romeo 145. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1995 Alfa Romeo 145 has manual transmission. 1995 Alfa Romeo 145 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Alfa Romeo 145 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 145 | CU-X |
Year Released | 1995 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 80 L |